Payz separates its business account for sending and managing funds from the merchant account used to accept payments.
Good
Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.
How this is calculatedDeposit fee
Not disclosed
Payout speed
Not disclosed
Currencies
50 currencies
Regions
4 regions
Supported regionsEurope · LATAM · Asia · AfricaPayz separates its business account for sending and managing funds from the merchant account used to accept payments. Its business page advertises payment acceptance in up to 50 currencies and integration with merchant platforms. Wallet availability and gambling approval must be checked for the applicable country and contracting entity.
Europe, LATAM, Asia, Africa operators evaluating e-wallet services with country-specific approval.
Verticals served
Strengths
Trade-offs
Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources
Licences
Not disclosed
iGaming stance
The official source describes the product and its use case. This is not an independently measured market-share or performance ranking.
Worth knowing: Country availability, account tier, currency conversion and withdrawal fees require separate review.
Primary-source review: 5 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.
The merchant product accepts wallet payments and advertises free platform integration in up to 50 currencies. Business expense-account transfers and card charges are different products and should not be copied into a casino acquiring tariff. Official source.
Unless otherwise agreed, business-entity terms charge €35 below €10,000, €80 from €10,000 to below €100,000, and 0.2% at €100,000 or above for account-to-bank settlement. Account-specific fees take precedence; third-party bank charges may remain. Official source.
The merchant fee table lists 2.99% currency conversion and €25 monthly inactivity. These are not the wallet-payment acceptance commission. Confirm the negotiated acquiring rate and whether inactivity conditions apply to the account. Official source.
Primary evidence for the industry use case or acceptance policy. Regional tags are evaluation coverage, not blanket gambling approval.
Checked 5 October 2026
Seven weighted factors produce 7.1. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.
Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026
5.5/10: a current authorisation for the contracting entity was not independently confirmed in the published evidence. The criterion is capped at 5.5 under the unverified-authorisation rubric. This is an evidence limitation, not a finding that the company is unlicensed or unlawful. For schemes and technical platforms, check the actual regulated PSP or acquirer rather than assuming the platform holds its authorisation.
Compliance criterion revised from 8.0 to 5.5 after the evidence review. Other criterion inputs were not changed.
iGaming acceptancederived
What we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract8.5 × 20% = 1.70
Regulatory & compliance
What we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets5.5 × 20% = 1.10
Fees
What we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float6.5 × 15% = 0.98
Geography
What we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category7.5 × 15% = 1.13
Settlement
What we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit7.5 × 10% = 0.75
Integration & API
What we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling7.0 × 10% = 0.70
Reliability & support
What we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling7.0 × 10% = 0.70
| Factor | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
iGaming acceptancederivedWhat we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract | 8.5 | 20% | 1.70 |
Regulatory & complianceWhat we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets | 5.5 | 20% | 1.10 |
FeesWhat we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float | 6.5 | 15% | 0.98 |
GeographyWhat we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category | 7.5 | 15% | 1.13 |
SettlementWhat we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit | 7.5 | 10% | 0.75 |
Integration & APIWhat we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling | 7.0 | 10% | 0.70 |
Reliability & supportWhat we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling | 7.0 | 10% | 0.70 |
| Composite | 7.1 | ||
Licence-by-licence access
Local account-to-account
Country-specific rail mix
Mobile money
SDKs, plugins and connectors
Not disclosed
No third-party rating sourced for Payz yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.
FAQ
Serves licensed gambling merchants as a matter of course. The official source describes the product and its use case. This is not an independently measured market-share or performance ranking.
Europe, LATAM, Asia, Africa. Coverage is where the rails reach — confirm acceptance for your specific licence separately, because the two are not the same thing.
We have no public rate card for Payz. No merchant-specific public figure verified in this research pass; request written terms. Ask for cost per successfully funded account under your own volume and market split rather than a headline rate.
Country availability, account tier, currency conversion and withdrawal fees require separate review.
The score is calculated from seven weighted criteria. See the scorecard on this page for the current criterion values, weights and total, and the methodology for the formula.
7.1
Good
Consider for the stated use case after verifying licensing fit and both payment directions. Country availability, account tier, currency conversion and withdrawal fees require separate review.
Best forEurope, LATAM, Asia, Africa operators evaluating e-wallet services with country-specific approval.
Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.
Sightline Payments / Play+Core verticalSightline's gaming products connect digital wallets and payment accounts with participating gaming venues and online operators.Same category as Payz · scores 0.1 lower7.0
JetonAcceptedJeton Business offers wallet acceptance, cross-border payment management and reporting through a single merchant integration.Same category as Payz · scores 0.3 lower6.8
NetellerAcceptedNETELLER's business product distinguishes a wallet-to-wallet merchant account from a send-only expense account.Same category as Payz · scores 0.3 higher7.4Put Payz next to an alternative
Opens the comparison tool with Payz already selected — add up to three more.
Compare PayzReview updated
Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.
