Account, bank-payment and treasury infrastructure with a dedicated iGaming use case.
Limited
Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.
How this is calculatedDeposit fee
Not disclosed
Payout speed
Not disclosed
Currencies
Fiat currencies and digital assets by product
Regions
1 region
Supported regionsEuropeOpenPayd provides accounts, bank payments, FX and digital-asset services through separate entities. It is most relevant to the banking and treasury layer of an operator’s stack. Account infrastructure does not itself provide a gambling licence, a global acquirer or permission to use every rail for player deposits.
Assessment basis. Acceptance is based on a dedicated iGaming solution rather than a generic fintech claim. Compliance receives credit for entity disclosures, with current permissions still requiring entity-specific register checks. Pricing is contractual. European banking scope is used conservatively for geography. Public API and sandbox material support integration; bank-route timing and support commitments remain contractual.
Licensed operators needing virtual accounts, reconciliation and bank or treasury payment rails.
Verticals served
Strengths
Trade-offs
Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources
Licences
Not disclosed
iGaming stance
Industry scope is based on the official product and policy sources below. Marketing claims are not independently measured market share or payment performance.
Worth knowing: Fiat and digital-asset services can have different counterparties.
Primary-source review: 19 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.
OpenPayd describes virtual accounts, bank payments and digital-asset infrastructure for iGaming. Its product separates fiat and digital-asset providers. Advertised speed and commercial benefits are provider claims, not independently measured results. Official source.
The group overview identifies SettleGo Solutions Limited, the Malta payment entity and separate digital-asset entities. It lists UK EMI FRN 900483 and describes which services each entity supplies. A company registration is distinct from a payment authorisation. Official source.
Service-specific terms refer to a separate pricing agreement and relevant conversion charges. Currency support and payment-rail availability must be confirmed for the actual account. Official source.
OpenPayd publishes API documentation and a sandbox for integrating account and payment operations. These tools support technical evaluation before an approved production launch. Official source.
Seven weighted factors produce 6.8. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.
Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026
5.5/10: a current authorisation for the contracting entity was not independently confirmed in the published evidence. The criterion is capped at 5.5 under the unverified-authorisation rubric. This is an evidence limitation, not a finding that the company is unlicensed or unlawful. For schemes and technical platforms, check the actual regulated PSP or acquirer rather than assuming the platform holds its authorisation.
Compliance criterion revised from 6.5 to 5.5 after the evidence review. Other criterion inputs were not changed.
iGaming acceptancederived
What we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract8.5 × 20% = 1.70
Regulatory & compliance
What we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets5.5 × 20% = 1.10
Fees
What we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float6.0 × 15% = 0.90
Geography
What we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category5.5 × 15% = 0.83
Settlement
What we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit7.0 × 10% = 0.70
Integration & API
What we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling9.0 × 10% = 0.90
Reliability & support
What we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling6.5 × 10% = 0.65
| Factor | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
iGaming acceptancederivedWhat we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract | 8.5 | 20% | 1.70 |
Regulatory & complianceWhat we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets | 5.5 | 20% | 1.10 |
FeesWhat we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float | 6.0 | 15% | 0.90 |
GeographyWhat we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category | 5.5 | 15% | 0.83 |
SettlementWhat we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit | 7.0 | 10% | 0.70 |
Integration & APIWhat we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling | 9.0 | 10% | 0.90 |
Reliability & supportWhat we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling | 6.5 | 10% | 0.65 |
| Composite | 6.8 | ||
Licence-by-licence access
Currencies
Fiat currencies and digital assets by product
Payment methods
Bank transfers, Virtual IBANs, Open banking where approved
Verticals
SDKs, plugins and connectors
REST API, Sandbox, Webhooks
No third-party rating sourced for OpenPayd yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.
FAQ
Account, bank-payment and treasury infrastructure with a dedicated iGaming use case. Fiat and digital-asset services can have different counterparties. Approval must cover the operator licence, player countries and payment product.
The 7.0/10 editorial score uses the seven weighted criteria in /methodology/. Acceptance is based on a dedicated iGaming solution rather than a generic fintech claim. Compliance receives credit for entity disclosures, with current permissions still requiring entity-specific register checks. Pricing is contractual. European banking scope is used conservatively for geography. Public API and sandbox material support integration; bank-route timing and support commitments remain contractual.
Published schedules and documented features are distinguished from negotiated terms. Figures without a verified public source are marked Not disclosed. Obtain a written quote for the approved merchant and payment route.
6.8
Limited
Licensed operators needing virtual accounts, reconciliation and bank or treasury payment rails. Fiat and digital-asset services can have different counterparties.
Best forLicensed operators needing virtual accounts, reconciliation and bank or treasury payment rails.
Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.
AeropayCore verticalUS bank-based gaming deposits and withdrawals, with written approval and state-specific onboarding.Same category as OpenPayd · scores the same6.8
OzowSelectiveOzow provides bank-based payment services with separate refund and payout workflows.Same category as OpenPayd · scores the same6.8
GigadatAcceptedGigadat provides Canadian bank-payment solutions centred on Interac e-Transfer, with pay-in and payout products for merchants.Same category as OpenPayd · scores 0.1 lower6.7Put OpenPayd next to an alternative
Opens the comparison tool with OpenPayd already selected — add up to three more.
Compare OpenPaydReview updated
Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.
