Closed service
Published termsThe official login notice says deposits ended on 27 February 2026 and available-balance withdrawals ended on 30 April 2026. This profile is historical, not an active merchant recommendation. Official source.

INSTADEBIT discontinued its deposit service: the official notice gives 27 February 2026 as the last day to deposit.
Not recommended
Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.
How this is calculatedDeposit fee
Not disclosed
Payout speed
Not disclosed
Currencies
Not disclosed
Regions
1 region
Supported regionsNorth AmericaINSTADEBIT discontinued its deposit service: the official notice gives 27 February 2026 as the last day to deposit. The notice describes remaining-balance transfers after inactivity and points customers to alternatives. This record is retained for historical reference, not as an available payment provider for new merchant integrations.
Historical reference and existing-customer closure guidance only
Verticals served
Strengths
Trade-offs
Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources
Licences
Not disclosed
iGaming stance
Historical service only. The official notice confirms that deposits ended on 27 February 2026.
Worth knowing: Discontinued: deposits ended on 27 February 2026 according to the official notice. Do not select this service for a new integration.
Primary-source review: 5 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.
The official login notice says deposits ended on 27 February 2026 and available-balance withdrawals ended on 30 April 2026. This profile is historical, not an active merchant recommendation. Official source.
The closure notice describes automatic return to the linked bank after 28 days of inactivity. That is a shutdown procedure, not a normal live player-payout SLA.
The notice names Interac as an alternative. This does not establish automatic migration of merchant integrations, balances or contracts; a replacement PSP must be separately selected and onboarded.
Primary evidence for the industry use case or acceptance policy. Regional tags are evaluation coverage, not blanket gambling approval.
Checked 5 October 2026
Checked 5 October 2026
Seven weighted factors produce 2.5. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.
Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026
5.0/10: a current authorisation for the contracting entity was not independently confirmed in the published evidence. The criterion is capped at 5.5 under the unverified-authorisation rubric. This is an evidence limitation, not a finding that the company is unlicensed or unlawful. For schemes and technical platforms, check the actual regulated PSP or acquirer rather than assuming the platform holds its authorisation.
iGaming acceptancederived
What we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract0.0 × 20% = 0.00
Regulatory & compliance
What we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets5.0 × 20% = 1.00
Fees
What we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float4.0 × 15% = 0.60
Geography
What we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category3.0 × 15% = 0.45
Settlement
What we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit1.0 × 10% = 0.10
Integration & API
What we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling2.0 × 10% = 0.20
Reliability & support
What we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling1.0 × 10% = 0.10
| Factor | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
iGaming acceptancederivedWhat we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract | 0.0 | 20% | 0.00 |
Regulatory & complianceWhat we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets | 5.0 | 20% | 1.00 |
FeesWhat we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float | 4.0 | 15% | 0.60 |
GeographyWhat we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category | 3.0 | 15% | 0.45 |
SettlementWhat we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit | 1.0 | 10% | 0.10 |
Integration & APIWhat we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling | 2.0 | 10% | 0.20 |
Reliability & supportWhat we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling | 1.0 | 10% | 0.10 |
| Composite | 2.5 | ||
State-level approval
Currencies
Not disclosed
Payment methods
Historical bank-linked deposit service — discontinued
Verticals
SDKs, plugins and connectors
Not disclosed
No third-party rating sourced for INSTADEBIT (discontinued) yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.
FAQ
Service discontinued; retained for historical reference, not a new merchant integration. Historical service only. The official notice confirms that deposits ended on 27 February 2026.
North America. Coverage is where the rails reach — confirm acceptance for your specific licence separately, because the two are not the same thing.
We have no public rate card for INSTADEBIT (discontinued). No merchant-specific public figure verified in this research pass; request written terms. Ask for cost per successfully funded account under your own volume and market split rather than a headline rate.
Discontinued: deposits ended on 27 February 2026 according to the official notice. Do not select this service for a new integration.
The score is calculated from seven weighted criteria. See the scorecard on this page for the current criterion values, weights and total, and the methodology for the formula.
2.5
Not recommended
Not available for new deposit integrations. Retained to prevent the discontinued service being mistaken for an active provider.
Best forHistorical reference and existing-customer closure guidance only
Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.
Put INSTADEBIT (discontinued) next to an alternative
Opens the comparison tool with INSTADEBIT (discontinued) already selected — add up to three more.
Compare INSTADEBIT (discontinued)Review updated
Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.