Inpay offers Money In open-banking services and Money Out cross-border bank payouts for iGaming.
Good
Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.
How this is calculatedDeposit fee
Not disclosed
Payout speed
Not disclosed
Currencies
Multi-currency payout offering
Regions
3 regions
Supported regionsEurope · LATAM · AsiaInpay offers Money In open-banking services and Money Out cross-border bank payouts for iGaming. Its industry page advertises multi-currency payout reach across more than 90 countries with API or tailored integrations. Bank reach and instant-rail availability are not a guaranteed withdrawal SLA for every merchant and recipient.
Europe, LATAM, Asia operators evaluating bank transfer services with country-specific approval.
Verticals served
Strengths
Trade-offs
Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources
Licences
Not disclosed
iGaming stance
The official source describes the product and its use case. This is not an independently measured market-share or performance ranking.
Worth knowing: Confirm the actual bank and country payout corridors; a regional research guide does not establish universal acceptance.
Primary-source review: 5 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.
Inpay distinguishes cardless open-banking pay-ins from multi-currency cross-border bank payouts. A single API or supported gaming-platform connection can be used; payout destinations and deposit banks are different coverage matrices. Official source.
The gaming page advertises a 90+ country network and full-amount local payouts with no hidden fees. Those are product claims, not a zero merchant processing tariff or guaranteed instant delivery at every destination.
The official developer portal was reachable but returned no readable reference content. The merchant must obtain the endpoint/status model, beneficiary validation, cancellation and reconciliation specification before treating the network as enabled. Official source.
Primary evidence for the industry use case or acceptance policy. Regional tags are evaluation coverage, not blanket gambling approval.
Checked 5 October 2026
Seven weighted factors produce 7.4. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.
Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026
5.5/10: a current authorisation for the contracting entity was not independently confirmed in the published evidence. The criterion is capped at 5.5 under the unverified-authorisation rubric. This is an evidence limitation, not a finding that the company is unlicensed or unlawful. For schemes and technical platforms, check the actual regulated PSP or acquirer rather than assuming the platform holds its authorisation.
Compliance criterion revised from 7.5 to 5.5 after the evidence review. Other criterion inputs were not changed.
iGaming acceptancederived
What we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract10.0 × 20% = 2.00
Regulatory & compliance
What we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets5.5 × 20% = 1.10
Fees
What we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float6.0 × 15% = 0.90
Geography
What we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category7.5 × 15% = 1.13
Settlement
What we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit8.0 × 10% = 0.80
Integration & API
What we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling7.5 × 10% = 0.75
Reliability & support
What we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling7.5 × 10% = 0.75
| Factor | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
iGaming acceptancederivedWhat we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract | 10.0 | 20% | 2.00 |
Regulatory & complianceWhat we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets | 5.5 | 20% | 1.10 |
FeesWhat we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float | 6.0 | 15% | 0.90 |
GeographyWhat we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category | 7.5 | 15% | 1.13 |
SettlementWhat we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit | 8.0 | 10% | 0.80 |
Integration & APIWhat we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling | 7.5 | 10% | 0.75 |
Reliability & supportWhat we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling | 7.5 | 10% | 0.75 |
| Composite | 7.4 | ||
Licence-by-licence access
Local account-to-account
Country-specific rail mix
Currencies
Multi-currency payout offering
Payment methods
Open-banking deposits, Domestic and cross-border bank payouts
Verticals
SDKs, plugins and connectors
Inpay API, Tailored merchant integrations
No third-party rating sourced for Inpay yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.
FAQ
Gambling is the provider's core business, not a tolerated vertical. The official source describes the product and its use case. This is not an independently measured market-share or performance ranking.
Europe, LATAM, Asia. Coverage is where the rails reach — confirm acceptance for your specific licence separately, because the two are not the same thing.
We have no public rate card for Inpay. No merchant-specific public figure verified in this research pass; request written terms. Ask for cost per successfully funded account under your own volume and market split rather than a headline rate.
Confirm the actual bank and country payout corridors; a regional research guide does not establish universal acceptance.
The score is calculated from seven weighted criteria. See the scorecard on this page for the current criterion values, weights and total, and the methodology for the formula.
7.4
Good
Consider for the stated use case after verifying licensing fit and both payment directions. Confirm the actual bank and country payout corridors; a regional research guide does not establish universal acceptance.
Best forEurope, LATAM, Asia operators evaluating bank transfer services with country-specific approval.
Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.
Unified CUPIS / Mobile CardCore verticalUnified CUPIS is the official Russian bookmaker-payment service operated by Mobile Card.Same category as Inpay · scores the same7.4
TrueLayerCore verticalTrueLayer's official bet365 announcement describes pay-by-bank deposits and withdrawals live in the UK and Germany.Same category as Inpay · scores 0.4 higher7.8
VoltCore verticalVolt connects gaming platforms to instant bank-transfer networks through an API or PSP connection.Same category as Inpay · scores 0.5 higher7.9Put Inpay next to an alternative
Opens the comparison tool with Inpay already selected — add up to three more.
Compare InpayReview updated
Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.
