Corefy is payment orchestration software rather than an acquiring bank.
Good
Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.
How this is calculatedDeposit fee
Not disclosed
Payout speed
Not disclosed
Currencies
200+ currencies
Regions
4 regions
Supported regionsEurope · LATAM · Asia · AfricaCorefy is payment orchestration software rather than an acquiring bank. Its current platform describes provider connectors, routing and cascading, white-label checkout, payout orchestration and reconciliation. Its advertised provider, method and currency totals describe connector reach; merchants still need their own PSP agreements and gambling approvals.
Operators past roughly five providers who need routing and one reconciliation view.
Verticals served
Strengths
Trade-offs
Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources
Licences
Not disclosed
iGaming stance
The official source describes the product and its use case. This is not an independently measured market-share or performance ranking.
Worth knowing: An orchestrator sits in the path of every transaction — its outage takes down the whole cashier, not one method.
Primary-source review: 5 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.
The pricing page describes a monthly platform fee and plan/add-on choices, including white-label functions and payment-flow integrations. This is orchestration software pricing, not the underlying PSP's merchant processing fee. Official source.
Corefy distinguishes hosted payment pages from merchant-built JavaScript/native UI using public APIs, plus server APIs and mass-payout integration. Card data handling and PCI scope depend on the selected flow. Official source.
A connector and routing rule let a merchant use a configured provider; they do not grant that provider's gambling approval or remove its country/currency limits. Compare Corefy platform costs and PSP acquiring/payout costs separately.
Seven weighted factors produce 7.6. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.
Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026
5.5/10: a current authorisation for the contracting entity was not independently confirmed in the published evidence. The criterion is capped at 5.5 under the unverified-authorisation rubric. This is an evidence limitation, not a finding that the company is unlicensed or unlawful. For schemes and technical platforms, check the actual regulated PSP or acquirer rather than assuming the platform holds its authorisation.
Compliance criterion revised from 7.5 to 5.5 after the evidence review. Other criterion inputs were not changed.
iGaming acceptancederived
What we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract8.5 × 20% = 1.70
Regulatory & compliance
What we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets5.5 × 20% = 1.10
Fees
What we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float7.0 × 15% = 1.05
Geography
What we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category8.5 × 15% = 1.27
Settlement
What we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit7.0 × 10% = 0.70
Integration & API
What we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling9.0 × 10% = 0.90
Reliability & support
What we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling9.0 × 10% = 0.90
| Factor | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
iGaming acceptancederivedWhat we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract | 8.5 | 20% | 1.70 |
Regulatory & complianceWhat we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets | 5.5 | 20% | 1.10 |
FeesWhat we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float | 7.0 | 15% | 1.05 |
GeographyWhat we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category | 8.5 | 15% | 1.27 |
SettlementWhat we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit | 7.0 | 10% | 0.70 |
Integration & APIWhat we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling | 9.0 | 10% | 0.90 |
Reliability & supportWhat we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling | 9.0 | 10% | 0.90 |
| Composite | 7.6 | ||
Licence-by-licence access
Local account-to-account
Country-specific rail mix
Mobile money
SDKs, plugins and connectors
Corefy orchestration API, Provider connectors, White-label checkout
No third-party rating sourced for Corefy yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.
FAQ
Serves licensed gambling merchants as a matter of course. The official source describes the product and its use case. This is not an independently measured market-share or performance ranking.
Europe, LATAM, Asia, Africa. Coverage is where the rails reach — confirm acceptance for your specific licence separately, because the two are not the same thing.
We have no public rate card for Corefy. A current merchant-specific public figure was not verified; confirm in the provider contract. Ask for cost per successfully funded account under your own volume and market split rather than a headline rate.
An orchestrator sits in the path of every transaction — its outage takes down the whole cashier, not one method.
The score is calculated from seven weighted criteria. See the scorecard on this page for the current criterion values, weights and total, and the methodology for the formula.
7.6
Good
Worth it past roughly five providers, and a single point of failure the day it goes down.
Best forOperators past roughly five providers who need routing and one reconciliation view.
Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.
IXOPAYAcceptedIXOPAY connects merchants to payment providers with orchestration, portable tokenisation, routing and reconciliation.Same category as Corefy · scores 0.1 lower7.5
PrimerAcceptedPrimer provides payment orchestration and optimisation with dynamic routing, fallback logic, network tokens and adaptive 3-D Secure.Same category as Corefy · scores 0.2 lower7.4
PayneteasyAcceptedPayneteasy supplies white-label payment technology with provider integrations, routing, 3-D Secure, reporting and reconciliation.Same category as Corefy · scores 0.5 lower7.1Put Corefy next to an alternative
Opens the comparison tool with Corefy already selected — add up to three more.
Compare CorefyReview updated
Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.
