Gaming payments
Provider claimAeropay describes bank-linked deposits and withdrawals for gaming platforms. Claims about approval, payout speed and cost are provider statements and depend on account and bank eligibility. Official source.
Aeropay Review: Payment Solution for iGaming
Core verticalBank Transfer
US bank-based gaming deposits and withdrawals, with written approval and state-specific onboarding.
6.8/ 10
Limited
0678910
Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.
How this is calculatedDeposit fee
Not disclosed
Payout speed
Not disclosed
Currencies
USD
Regions
1 region
Supported regionsNorth AmericaWhat Aeropay is
Aeropay offers account-to-account payments for gaming through bank-linked deposits and withdrawals. The player experience can be immediate while merchant funding follows separate batching and settlement rules. Its merchant terms require lawful activity, current licences and prior written consent for online gambling.
Assessment basis. A dedicated gaming product supports acceptance, while the terms retain written-consent and licence checks. The reviewed evidence establishes a financial-institution-partner model, not a universally verified gaming licence. Pricing is contractual. US concentration limits geography. Documented batching prevents treating immediate player credit as merchant settlement; integration and reliability were reviewed from documentation, not live transaction tests.
Best for
Approved US gaming operators adding bank payments alongside existing card or wallet methods.
Verticals served
Online CasinoSports Betting
Strengths
- Dedicated online-gaming product
- Deposits and withdrawals through linked bank accounts
- Public explanation of merchant settlement movements
Trade-offs
- Instant player availability is not the same as final bank settlement.
Fees
- Deposit fee
- Not disclosed
- Withdrawal fee
- Not disclosed
- Minimum
- Not disclosed
- Maximum
- Not disclosed
Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources
Licensing, compliance and risk
Licences
Not disclosed
iGaming stance
Core vertical
Industry scope is based on the official product and policy sources below. Marketing claims are not independently measured market share or payment performance.
Worth knowing: US-focused bank payments rather than global acquiring.
Product details and operating conditions
Primary-source review: 19 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.
Approval, fees and licences
Published termsOnline gambling requires prior written consent. The merchant must maintain the licences needed for its activity, and fees are set in the merchant agreement. The terms reference Aeropay’s financial-institution partners. Official source.
Merchant settlement
Documented featureThe settlement guide distinguishes deposits, payouts and funding movements. Gaming batches have a stated daily cut-off; player payment availability and the merchant’s bank credit are separate events. Official source.
Player flow
Documented featureA new payer links a bank account, confirms the amount and completes the payment. Withdrawal access depends on the connected account and the enabled gaming flow. Official source.
Risk controls
Provider claimAeropay describes network-level transaction signals and real-time risk assessment. We did not independently measure approval rates, return rates or uptime. Official source.
Research limits and open questions
- No live payment, approval-rate or uptime benchmark was conducted.
- Negotiated reserves, complete merchant fees and contractual settlement SLAs require a provider quote.
- Regulatory scope is entity-specific; no claim of a clean enforcement history or universal gambling approval is made.
Our score and how it is built
Seven weighted factors produce 6.8. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.
Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026
5.5/10: a current authorisation for the contracting entity was not independently confirmed in the published evidence. The criterion is capped at 5.5 under the unverified-authorisation rubric. This is an evidence limitation, not a finding that the company is unlicensed or unlawful. For schemes and technical platforms, check the actual regulated PSP or acquirer rather than assuming the platform holds its authorisation.
Compliance criterion revised from 6.0 to 5.5 after the evidence review. Other criterion inputs were not changed.
iGaming acceptancederived
What we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract10.0 × 20% = 2.00
Regulatory & compliance
What we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets5.5 × 20% = 1.10
Fees
What we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float6.0 × 15% = 0.90
Geography
What we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category5.0 × 15% = 0.75
Settlement
What we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit7.0 × 10% = 0.70
Integration & API
What we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling7.0 × 10% = 0.70
Reliability & support
What we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling6.0 × 10% = 0.60
- Composite6.8
| Factor | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
iGaming acceptancederivedWhat we assess for iGaming acceptanceWhether gambling merchants are onboarded at allWhether the category is core business or a tolerated exceptionMarket-by-market acceptance, not just technical coverageWhether access runs through a scheme participant rather than a contract | 10.0 | 20% | 2.00 |
Regulatory & complianceWhat we assess for Regulatory & complianceJurisdictions served and licences heldOwn acquiring licence versus a sponsor bankRegulator-imposed payment controls supportedTrack record in regulated markets | 5.5 | 20% | 1.10 |
FeesWhat we assess for FeesPublished rate cards where they existWhether pricing is knowable before contractingFX spread disclosureRolling reserves and settlement float | 6.0 | 15% | 0.90 |
GeographyWhat we assess for GeographyNumber of markets servedDepth of local methods within eachCurrency listWhether coverage means availability for this category | 5.0 | 15% | 0.75 |
SettlementWhat we assess for SettlementDeposit-to-balance timeWithdrawal-to-player timeWeekend and holiday behaviourWhether the provider or the scheme sets the limit | 7.0 | 10% | 0.70 |
Integration & APIWhat we assess for Integration & APIAPI and documentation qualitySDKs, plugins and platform connectorsTime from contract to first live transactionSandbox and testing tooling | 7.0 | 10% | 0.70 |
Reliability & supportWhat we assess for Reliability & supportObserved uptime and incident historyStatus page and incident communicationSupport model and escalation pathReconciliation and reporting tooling | 6.0 | 10% | 0.60 |
| Composite | 6.8 | ||
Supported regions
North America
State-level approval
Capabilities
Currencies
USD
Payment methods
Bank-linked deposits, Bank withdrawals
Verticals
Online CasinoSports Betting
Processing and payout speed
- Deposit settlement
- Not disclosed
- Withdrawal settlement
- Not disclosed
Integrations and technology
SDKs, plugins and connectors
Gaming payment integration, Aerosync bank linking
Company information
- Headquarters
- Not disclosed
- Founded
- Not disclosed
- Website
- aeropay.com
User ratings
No third-party rating sourced for Aeropay yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.
FAQ
Questions about Aeropay
Does Aeropay support gambling merchants?
US bank-based gaming deposits and withdrawals, with written approval and state-specific onboarding. US-focused bank payments rather than global acquiring. Approval must cover the operator licence, player countries and payment product.
How is Aeropay's score calculated?
The 6.9/10 editorial score uses the seven weighted criteria in /methodology/. A dedicated gaming product supports acceptance, while the terms retain written-consent and licence checks. The reviewed evidence establishes a financial-institution-partner model, not a universally verified gaming licence. Pricing is contractual. US concentration limits geography. Documented batching prevents treating immediate player credit as merchant settlement; integration and reliability were reviewed from documentation, not live transaction tests.
Are Aeropay's merchant fees and settlement times verified?
Published schedules and documented features are distinguished from negotiated terms. Figures without a verified public source are marked Not disclosed. Obtain a written quote for the approved merchant and payment route.
Aeropay in one line
6.8
Limited
Approved US gaming operators adding bank payments alongside existing card or wallet methods. US-focused bank payments rather than global acquiring.
Best forApproved US gaming operators adding bank payments alongside existing card or wallet methods.
If this is not the right fit
Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.
OpenPaydAcceptedAccount, bank-payment and treasury infrastructure with a dedicated iGaming use case.Same category as Aeropay · scores the same6.8
OzowSelectiveOzow provides bank-based payment services with separate refund and payout workflows.Same category as Aeropay · scores the same6.8
GigadatAcceptedGigadat provides Canadian bank-payment solutions centred on Interac e-Transfer, with pay-in and payout products for merchants.Same category as Aeropay · scores 0.1 lower6.7Featured in
Put Aeropay next to an alternative
Opens the comparison tool with Aeropay already selected — add up to three more.
Compare AeropayReview updated
Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.