Skip to content
iGaming Hub
Payhound logo

Payhound Review: Payment Solution for iGaming

Core verticalCrypto Payments

Crypto deposits, player wallet mapping and payouts with fiat conversion for approved gaming operators.

7.3/ 10

Good

0678910

Editorial assessment, not a live-tested payment performance benchmark.

How this is calculated

Deposit fee

Not disclosed

Payout speed

Not disclosed

Currencies

BTC, ETH, USDC

Regions

1 region

What Payhound is

Payhound provides crypto-asset services and payment infrastructure from Malta, with a dedicated gaming product. The AMF register confirms its Maltese MiCA authorisation and passported services in France. Merchant eligibility, supported assets and bank settlement terms remain distinct from that regulatory status.

Assessment basis. Gaming is a dedicated vertical. AMF’s official passport entry supports compliance, with payment-institution permission separately attributed to Payhound’s own announcement. Fees are quote-based and geography is conservatively European. Conversion and payouts support settlement functionality but not a verified universal SLA. API integration is advertised; complete public technical access and independent uptime measurements were not obtained.

Best for

European licensed operators evaluating crypto acceptance with managed fiat conversion.

Verticals served

Online CasinoSports Betting

Strengths

  • Regulator-confirmed MiCA passport entry
  • Gaming-specific deposit and payout workflows
  • Player wallet mapping and crypto-to-fiat conversion

Trade-offs

  • Conversion reduces market exposure but does not eliminate custody or counterparty risk.

Fees

Deposit fee
Not disclosed
Withdrawal fee
Not disclosed
Minimum
Not disclosed
Maximum
Not disclosed

Figures marked “Not disclosed” have no public source. Most iGaming payment pricing is negotiated per merchant — we leave the gap visible rather than estimating.How we handle sources

Licensing, compliance and risk

Licences

MFSA MiCA-authorised CASP; AMF confirms passported crypto-asset services in France.

iGaming stance

Core vertical

Industry scope is based on the official product and policy sources below. Marketing claims are not independently measured market share or payment performance.

Worth knowing: Merchant fees and bank settlement SLAs are not publicly universal.

Product details and operating conditions

Primary-source review: 19 October 2026. This is documentary research, not live payment testing. Provider claims are identified separately from documented terms.

Gaming operations

Provider claim

The gaming product describes player deposit addresses, crypto payouts and conversion into fiat. It advertises BTC, ETH and USDC alongside EUR, GBP and USD conversion. Instant processing language is not an independently measured bank-settlement SLA. Official source.

Regulator confirmation

Documented feature

The AMF’s CASP entry confirms Maltese MiCA authorisation and passported crypto services in France, including custody, exchange, execution and transfers. Its displayed date refers to the start of intended French service provision. Official source.

Payment institution announcement

Provider claim

Payhound announced a Maltese PSD2 financial-institution licence on 5 March 2026. This statement is attributed to the provider; it is separate from the regulator-confirmed crypto-service passport entry. Official source.

Office and support

Documented feature

The support page identifies its Birkirkara headquarters and operational contact routes. A full public integration specification or contractual 24/7 support SLA was not established from this page. Official source.

Research limits and open questions

  • No live payment, approval-rate or uptime benchmark was conducted.
  • Negotiated reserves, complete merchant fees and contractual settlement SLAs require a provider quote.
  • Regulatory scope is entity-specific; no claim of a clean enforcement history or universal gambling approval is made.

Our score and how it is built

Seven weighted factors produce 7.3. The heaviest is derived from the stance above, not scored by hand.

Regulatory assessment · 21 October 2026

8.0/10: the review contains dated, entity-specific licensing evidence. The original source check date is retained. This evidence audit does not establish a complete multi-entity enforcement history or justify a 9–10 score. Payment authorisation and gambling approval remain separate checks.

Read the entity and source evidence
  • iGaming acceptancederived

    10.0 × 20% = 2.00

  • Regulatory & compliance

    8.0 × 20% = 1.60

  • Fees

    6.0 × 15% = 0.90

  • Geography

    5.5 × 15% = 0.83

  • Settlement

    7.0 × 10% = 0.70

  • Integration & API

    6.5 × 10% = 0.65

  • Reliability & support

    6.0 × 10% = 0.60

  • Composite7.3

Supported regions

Europe

Licence-by-licence access

Capabilities

Currencies

BTC, ETH, USDC

Payment methods

Crypto deposits, Crypto payouts, Crypto-to-fiat conversion

Verticals

Online CasinoSports Betting

Processing and payout speed

Deposit settlement
Not disclosed
Withdrawal settlement
Not disclosed

Integrations and technology

SDKs, plugins and connectors

Merchant API, Player address mapping

Company information

Headquarters
Birkirkara, Malta
Founded
Not disclosed

User ratings

No third-party rating sourced for Payhound yet. When one is added it will name its source — Trustpilot, G2 or similar — and the date it was read, in the same way every other figure on this site does.

FAQ

Questions about Payhound

Does Payhound support gambling merchants?

Crypto deposits, player wallet mapping and payouts with fiat conversion for approved gaming operators. Merchant fees and bank settlement SLAs are not publicly universal. Approval must cover the operator licence, player countries and payment product.

How is Payhound's score calculated?

The 7.3/10 editorial score uses the seven weighted criteria in /methodology/. Gaming is a dedicated vertical. AMF’s official passport entry supports compliance, with payment-institution permission separately attributed to Payhound’s own announcement. Fees are quote-based and geography is conservatively European. Conversion and payouts support settlement functionality but not a verified universal SLA. API integration is advertised; complete public technical access and independent uptime measurements were not obtained.

Are Payhound's merchant fees and settlement times verified?

Published schedules and documented features are distinguished from negotiated terms. Figures without a verified public source are marked Not disclosed. Obtain a written quote for the approved merchant and payment route.

Payhound in one line

7.3

Good

European licensed operators evaluating crypto acceptance with managed fiat conversion. Merchant fees and bank settlement SLAs are not publicly universal.

Best forEuropean licensed operators evaluating crypto acceptance with managed fiat conversion.

If this is not the right fit

Closest by category and score, from the same catalog and the same model.

Put Payhound next to an alternative

Opens the comparison tool with Payhound already selected — add up to three more.

Compare Payhound

Review updated

Terms and availability can change. Confirm current merchant-specific conditions before contracting.